and you see if he's totally overmatched or just has a hole, and you see if he makes adjustments to improve (which he did) and you decide if his defense, which is in another world from Burriss', is worth the risk that he can become a .250 hitter who works counts and has some power.
Everything you said about his offense could have been said about Omar Vizquel's or Ozzie Smith's. I'm not putting Crawford's defense on that level but they are just two examples of light hitting guys who learned to be solid hitters.
If you'd rather have Burriss at short I guess you don't care about defense much.
You watch and you see how they get him out and if he adjusts
User account number (uid): 5796
Posted by Earl j. Slick on 2011-12-03 14:28:22
In Reply to: he still hasn't hit at any level......i would actually rather have burriss over him...better minor league numbers
posted by ucsbben on 2011-12-03 12:12:38
Posted by Earl j. Slick on 2011-12-03 14:28:22
In Reply to: he still hasn't hit at any level......i would actually rather have burriss over him...better minor league numbers
posted by ucsbben on 2011-12-03 12:12:38

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:
Login with existing account
Create a new account
-