back him up with a veteran (but not old) utility guy. But there seems to be this big assumption that Crawford has no chance to hit. Check him in September compared to July.
And no matter what, the money they spend on a hitter should not be spent on a shortstop unless it's a huge upgrade. They should concentrate what they have to spend on one corner outfielder. They can live with a weak hitting shortstop who plays great defense if it comes to that. It's not like the team was losing when he was starting last summer.
Well, my view is you give the kid a shot and
User account number (uid): 5796
Posted by Earl j. Slick on 2011-12-03 08:59:06
In Reply to: The difference is Crawford was rushed and didn't have a good batting avg in the minors
posted by Calvin and Hobbs on 2011-12-02 19:30:29
Posted by Earl j. Slick on 2011-12-03 08:59:06
In Reply to: The difference is Crawford was rushed and didn't have a good batting avg in the minors
posted by Calvin and Hobbs on 2011-12-02 19:30:29

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:
Login with existing account
Create a new account
-