"Two to tango. Two assailants plus Stow = 3. 3 is not 2, ergo no tango.
McCourt's lawyer is a smarmy asshole. How much can we award?"
Old lady jots down some notes.
User account number (uid): 5796
Posted by Earl j. Slick on 2011-10-27 16:22:13
In Reply to: LOL...that's a helluva Defense: "Your honor, I'd like the jury to consider - for a moment - the age-old adage, 'it takes two to tango."
posted by JoeDaddy on 2011-10-27 13:04:27
Posted by Earl j. Slick on 2011-10-27 16:22:13
In Reply to: LOL...that's a helluva Defense: "Your honor, I'd like the jury to consider - for a moment - the age-old adage, 'it takes two to tango."
posted by JoeDaddy on 2011-10-27 13:04:27
-
SF Gate:...Dodgers say Stow and his assailants responsible for beating, not them
- 2011-10-27 12:56:42 (108 views)
-
Earl, what's your take on this?
- 2011-10-27 14:35:29 (18 views)
-
For one, that's some of the worst reporting I've ever seen.
- 2011-10-27 16:20:30 (74 views)
-
Thanks for the analysis.
- 2011-10-28 07:20:22 (12 views)
-
Thanks for the analysis.
-
For one, that's some of the worst reporting I've ever seen.
- 2011-10-27 16:20:30 (74 views)
-
LOL...that's a helluva Defense: "Your honor, I'd like the jury to consider - for a moment - the age-old adage, 'it takes two to tango."
- 2011-10-27 13:04:27 (82 views)
-
Hahaha
- 2011-10-27 14:29:21 (18 views)
-
Hahaha
-
Earl, what's your take on this?
You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:
Login with existing account
Create a new account
